Quantum Entanglement

Quantum Entanglement, Cosmic Consciousness, Collective Mysticism, and LoveShift

Physics • Philosophy • Consciousness • Ethics

Introduction

This article examines quantum entanglement as both a rigorously tested physical phenomenon and a catalyst for broader philosophical reflection. It considers the scientific foundations of entanglement, the concept of Cosmic Consciousness ("Big C"), the idea of Collective Mysticism, and the practical implications of an ethic of interconnection described here as LoveShift.

Executive Summary

Quantum entanglement describes a condition in which particles exhibit correlated properties in ways that cannot be fully explained by classical local theories. From Einstein's objections to Bell's theorem and Nobel Prize-winning experiments, entanglement has transformed our understanding of physical reality. This article then extends that discussion into philosophy, consciousness studies, mysticism, and global ethics, asking what a relational universe might imply for human identity, responsibility, and collective survival.

At a Glance

- 1935: EPR paper
- 1964: Bell's theorem
- 2022: Nobel recognition

Contents

1. Introduction to Quantum Entanglement: The Fabric of Reality
2. The Science of Connection: Bell's Theorem and Beyond
3. The Big C: Cosmic Consciousness and the Quantum Observer
4. Collective Mysticism: The Ancient Echo of Modern Science
5. Special Section: Quantum Implications for War, Climate, and Government
- Implications for War and Conflict
- Implications for Climate and Ecology
- Implications for Government and Policy
6. Applied Perspective: Implications for Life on Earth and LoveShift
7. Questions & Answers
8. Conclusion
9. References & Further Reading

1. Introduction to Quantum Entanglement: The Fabric of Reality

At the heart of modern physics lies a phenomenon so counterintuitive that it challenged the greatest minds of the twentieth century. Quantum entanglement occurs when pairs or groups of particles interact in such a way that the quantum state of each particle cannot be described independently of the others, even when the particles are separated by large distances. Instead, the system must be treated as a single quantum whole.

When Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen published the EPR paper in 1935, they intended to show that quantum mechanics was incomplete. Einstein famously objected to entanglement as "spooky action at a distance" because it appeared to violate locality, the principle that an event in one location cannot instantly affect an event in another without some mediating signal limited by the speed of light. Yet decades of experiments have shown that the predictions of quantum mechanics are correct in precisely this unusual domain.

A common analogy is a pair of perfectly linked coins. If one lands heads, the other must land tails, no matter how far away it is. In the quantum world, however, the analogy is only partial because the particles do not simply carry hidden preassigned values. Their correlated behavior emerges in ways that resist classical explanation. This has led many physicists and philosophers to reconsider whether separateness, as ordinarily perceived, is a complete description of reality.

Core Idea

Entanglement suggests that some physical systems must be described as wholes, not as fully independent parts.

Historical Trigger

The 1935 EPR paper challenged whether quantum mechanics provided a complete account of physical reality.

2. The Science of Connection: Bell's Theorem and Beyond

The debate between Einstein and Niels Bohr remained largely philosophical until 1964, when John Stewart Bell developed Bell's theorem. Bell derived inequalities that any local hidden-variable theory must satisfy. If experiments violated those inequalities, then the classical local picture would fail.

Later experiments by John Clauser, Alain Aspect, Anton Zeilinger, and others repeatedly violated Bell's inequalities under increasingly stringent conditions. These results demonstrated that nature does not behave according to local hidden-variable expectations. In 2022, Clauser, Aspect, and Zeilinger were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for foundational experiments involving entangled photons.

The significance of these findings is difficult to overstate. They do not merely refine a technical detail inside physics; they challenge deeply intuitive assumptions about independence, separability, and causal structure. At the quantum level, reality appears more relational than object-centered. Properties are often defined through systems, measurements, and correlations rather than isolated entities existing with fully determinate attributes on their own.

Scientific Milestone

Bell's theorem converted a philosophical dispute into an experimentally testable proposition.

Key Outcome

Repeated violations of Bell inequalities undermined local hidden-variable explanations.

3. The Big C: Cosmic Consciousness and the Quantum Observer

Once the discussion moves beyond mathematics and laboratory results, quantum theory opens into wider philosophical questions. One such question concerns consciousness. The idea referred to here as the "Big C" proposes that consciousness is not merely a byproduct of matter but a fundamental feature of reality itself.

This line of thought is often connected, rightly or wrongly, to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. In the double-slit experiment, quantum systems behave probabilistically until measurement yields a definite outcome. Some interpretations have suggested that consciousness plays a decisive role in that transition, although there is no scientific consensus that human awareness is required. Nonetheless, the conceptual overlap between observation, measurement, and reality formation continues to inspire philosophical inquiry.

Under the Big C view, the universe is not fundamentally inert but participatory. Individual minds may be understood as local expressions of a more universal field of awareness. Quantum entanglement then functions as either a metaphor for this underlying unity or, in more speculative accounts, a clue to the deep structure of conscious existence. While such interpretations remain contested, they have become a central part of interdisciplinary conversations linking physics, metaphysics, and consciousness studies.

Interpretive Caution

Quantum mechanics raises questions about observation, but it does not conclusively prove that consciousness creates reality.

Philosophical Relevance

The Big C serves as a framework for exploring whether consciousness is fundamental rather than derivative.

4. Collective Mysticism: The Ancient Echo of Modern Science

Long before the rise of quantum mechanics, mystical traditions across cultures described reality as an interconnected whole. In this context, Collective Mysticism refers to shared or repeatable forms of insight in which individual separateness gives way to a direct sense of unity.

Examples appear in many traditions. Hindu philosophy offers the image of Indra's Net, a cosmic web in which each jewel reflects every other jewel. Buddhism emphasizes dependent origination, the principle that nothing exists independently and that all phenomena arise in relation to conditions. In Western thought, comparable themes appear in Neoplatonism, Christian mysticism, and some modern psychological frameworks, including aspects of Jung's collective unconscious.

From a scholarly perspective, it is important not to confuse metaphorical similarity with scientific identity. Quantum entanglement does not prove mystical doctrines. Still, the resonance is intellectually striking. Both perspectives challenge atomistic views of existence and propose that what appears separate may, at a deeper level, be interdependent. This convergence has made entanglement a powerful symbolic bridge between science and spirituality.

Cross-Cultural Echo

- Indra's Net
- Dependent Origination
- Collective Unconscious

Important Distinction

Philosophical resonance with quantum theory is suggestive, but it should not be mistaken for direct scientific proof.

5. Special Section: Quantum Implications for War, Climate, and Government

Implications for War and Conflict

The Illusion of Isolated Conflict

For centuries, the architecture of human conflict was built upon Newtonian principles: objects colliding in defined spaces, localized impacts, and clear boundaries separating the battlefield from the home front. War was understood as a zero-sum mechanical interaction where kinetic force applied in one geographic location yielded a proportional, localized result. However, as our understanding of reality shifts toward a quantum paradigm—where entanglement dictates that particles, once interacted, remain intimately connected regardless of distance—the very concept of an "isolated conflict" begins to unravel. In a deeply entangled global society, the illusion that a war can be contained within arbitrary national borders is not just politically naive; it is fundamentally at odds with the structural reality of the modern world.

When violence erupts in one region today, the shockwaves do not dissipate at the border. They propagate instantaneously through entangled global systems. A localized kinetic strike immediately disrupts international supply chains, triggers volatile fluctuations in global energy markets, and initiates cascading economic crises that can starve populations thousands of miles away. The traditional military doctrine of "collateral damage" is entirely insufficient to describe this phenomenon. In an entangled system, collateral damage is not an accidental byproduct affecting bystanders; it is a direct, unavoidable alteration of the entire systemic web. Just as measuring the spin of one entangled photon instantly determines the state of its partner, a geopolitical action in one hemisphere instantly collapses the economic and social probabilities in another.

Quantum Technologies on the Battlefield

Beyond the metaphorical, quantum mechanics is actively rewriting the literal tools of warfare. The advent of Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and quantum cryptography promises to create communication networks that are theoretically unhackable. Because any attempt to intercept a quantum key alters its state—alerting the communicating parties to the breach—the fog of war regarding intelligence interception may fundamentally change. Nations possessing mature quantum communication infrastructure will operate with an unprecedented level of secure coordination, rendering classical cyber warfare tactics obsolete.

Furthermore, the development of quantum radar and quantum sensing technologies threatens to eliminate the stealth capabilities that have defined modern aerial and naval combat. Quantum radar utilizes entangled photon pairs, sending one out to bounce off a potential target while retaining the other for observation. By measuring the returning photon and comparing it to its entangled partner, military operators can detect stealth aircraft with absolute precision, stripping away the invisibility cloaks of modern bombers and submarines. This technological leap forces a terrifying acceleration of the arms race, where the speed of detection and response approaches the instantaneous, leaving almost zero margin for human error or diplomatic pause.

The Psychological Entanglement of Combatants

The implications of entanglement extend deeply into the psychological and social realms of conflict. In previous eras, the trauma of war was largely confined to the combatants and the immediate civilian population. Today, the digital revolution—a byproduct of quantum mechanics in the form of semiconductors and modern computing—has created a mechanism for the non-local transmission of psychological trauma. The horrors of the battlefield are broadcast in real-time, in high definition, into the living rooms and smartphones of the global public. This creates a form of collective psychological entanglement.

The emotional state of a global populace becomes inextricably linked to the localized violence. We see the rise of secondary trauma, where populations far removed from the physical danger experience profound psychological distress, political radicalization, and social polarization as a direct result of observing the conflict. The observer is no longer separate from the observed; the act of witnessing the war alters the state of the witness, which in turn alters the political pressures applied to the combatants. This feedback loop perfectly mirrors the participatory nature of the quantum universe, where observation fundamentally changes the system being measured.

Mutually Assured Entanglement

During the Cold War, the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) maintained a fragile peace through the threat of total nuclear annihilation. In the quantum era, we are entering a phase of Mutually Assured Entanglement. Because our economic, ecological, and digital systems are so deeply intertwined, destroying an enemy state inevitably means inflicting catastrophic damage upon oneself. If a nation launches a devastating cyberattack to cripple a rival's financial sector, the resulting collapse will instantly infect the attacker's own markets. The binary concept of "us versus them" breaks down when the "us" and the "them" are merely two nodes in the same entangled network.

This reality demands a radical shift in how we conceptualize security. Security can no longer be achieved by building higher walls, developing more destructive weapons, or isolating oneself from the global community. In an entangled world, security is a shared state. It is a property of the whole system, not an attribute of an individual part. Therefore, the only viable path to national security is global stability. This realization forces a transition from competitive, zero-sum military strategies to cooperative, systemic resilience building.

De-escalation and Relational Peacebuilding (LoveShift)

Applying the ethos of LoveShift to warfare means recognizing that true peace is not merely the absence of kinetic violence, but the active cultivation of healthy, relational interdependencies. If we accept that we are fundamentally entangled, then diplomacy must evolve from a transactional negotiation between separate entities into a holistic management of a shared ecosystem. De-escalation becomes the primary imperative, not out of moral weakness, but out of a profound understanding of systemic self-preservation.

Relational peacebuilding requires us to address the root causes of conflict—resource scarcity, historical trauma, economic disparity—not as isolated problems occurring "over there," but as infections within our shared body. It demands an empathy that is grounded in physics: the recognition that the suffering of the "other" is, ultimately and unavoidably, our own suffering. By aligning our geopolitical strategies with the reality of deep entanglement, we can begin to dismantle the archaic machinery of war and construct a global architecture of mutual survival and flourishing.

Implications for Climate and Ecology

The Earth as a Macroscopic Entangled System

The climate crisis is arguably the most urgent and undeniable manifestation of our entangled reality. For generations, human civilization operated under the assumption that the Earth was an infinite sink for our waste and an inexhaustible reservoir for our extraction. We treated local environments as isolated terrariums; a forest cleared in one country or a river polluted in another were viewed as localized tragedies with no broader consequences. The science of ecology, much like quantum mechanics, has entirely dismantled this illusion of separability. The Earth's biosphere operates as a single, macroscopic entangled system, where a perturbation in one seemingly isolated variable cascades non-locally across the entire planetary web.

Consider the relationship between the Amazon rainforest and the global climate. The Amazon does not merely sit within the borders of South American nations; it functions as the lungs and the air conditioner for the entire planet. Deforestation in the Amazon alters precipitation patterns in the agricultural heartlands of North America, accelerates the melting of ice sheets in the Arctic, and shifts ocean currents in the Atlantic. The carbon molecule emitted from a tailpipe in London is indistinguishable from, and instantly entangled with, the atmospheric dynamics that cause a devastating drought in Sub-Saharan Africa. There is no "away" to which we can throw our waste; in a deeply relational universe, everything is here.

Quantum Biology and the Fabric of Life

The connection between quantum mechanics and ecology is not merely metaphorical; it is deeply biological. The emerging field of quantum biology has revealed that the fundamental processes of life rely on quantum phenomena. Photosynthesis, the foundational energy-capturing mechanism that sustains almost all life on Earth, utilizes quantum coherence. When a photon of sunlight strikes a plant leaf, the energy does not travel randomly through the cell to the reaction center. Instead, it enters a state of quantum superposition, exploring all possible paths simultaneously to find the most efficient route. This means that the very basis of the planetary food web, the process that generates the oxygen we breathe, is governed by the rules of the quantum realm.

Similarly, avian navigation—how birds migrate thousands of miles across featureless oceans—is believed to rely on quantum entanglement within proteins in their eyes, allowing them to "see" the Earth's magnetic field. These discoveries profoundly shift our understanding of nature. Life is not a clunky, mechanical machine; it is a highly tuned, quantum-sensitive phenomenon. When we disrupt ecosystems with chemical pollutants, electromagnetic noise, and rapid temperature shifts, we are not just breaking mechanical parts; we are interfering with the delicate quantum coherence that sustains the biosphere.

Quantum Computing in Climate Modeling

As we face the daunting complexity of the climate crisis, classical computing is reaching its limits. The Earth's climate is a chaotic, non-linear system with billions of interacting variables—ocean temperatures, atmospheric pressure, cloud albedo, ice reflectivity, and biological feedback loops. Predicting the exact trajectory of climate change using classical bits (which must be either 0 or 1) is incredibly slow and imprecise. However, the advent of quantum computing offers a revolutionary tool for ecological salvation.

Quantum computers, utilizing qubits that can exist in superposition and be entangled with one another, are uniquely suited to model complex, fluid, and deeply interconnected systems. A mature quantum computer could simulate the Earth's climate with unprecedented fidelity, allowing us to accurately predict tipping points, model the exact efficacy of geoengineering proposals, and discover new, highly efficient catalysts for carbon capture. By harnessing the power of entanglement at the computational level, we may finally gain the predictive clarity needed to navigate the narrow path toward planetary stabilization.

The Butterfly Effect and Ecological Tipping Points

In classical physics, small causes have small effects. In chaotic, entangled systems, small causes can trigger massive, systemic phase transitions—a phenomenon popularly known as the butterfly effect. In the context of climate change, this manifests as ecological tipping points. The melting of the permafrost in Siberia releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas, which causes further warming, which melts more permafrost. This is a non-linear feedback loop.

Because the biosphere is an entangled whole, crossing a tipping point in one biome can trigger a domino effect across others. The collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) would drastically alter the monsoons in Asia and plunge Europe into a deep freeze, fundamentally rewriting the agricultural capacity of the planet. We are currently playing a dangerous game of Russian roulette with an entangled Earth, pushing localized systems to their limits without fully grasping the non-local catastrophes that will follow.

Regenerative Ecology as Relational Ethics (LoveShift)

To survive the climate crisis, we must undergo a profound LoveShift in our relationship with the natural world. This requires abandoning the extractive, atomized mindset that views nature as a collection of resources to be exploited for short-term profit. Instead, we must adopt an ethic of regenerative stewardship, grounded in the understanding that human beings are not separate from the environment; we are an expression of it. What we do to the web of life, we do to ourselves.

A quantum-informed ecology demands that we design our economies, our agriculture, and our cities to mimic and support the interconnected resilience of natural systems. It means shifting from linear models of production (take, make, dispose) to circular models where waste becomes food for another process. It means recognizing the intrinsic value of biodiversity, not just for its aesthetic or pharmaceutical potential, but because every species is a vital node in the entangled network that maintains the habitability of our shared home. Ultimately, addressing climate change is not just a technological challenge; it is a profound test of our capacity to expand our consciousness and embrace our deep, inescapable connection to the living Earth.

Implications for Government and Policy

From Newtonian to Quantum Governance

The modern administrative state was designed during the Enlightenment, heavily influenced by the Newtonian worldview. In this classical model, government is structured like a clockwork mechanism. Society is divided into distinct, manageable parts, and the bureaucracy is organized into isolated silos: the Department of Energy, the Department of Education, the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Health. The underlying assumption is that problems can be isolated, studied, and solved independently by specialized agencies. However, as the complexity of the 21st century accelerates, this mechanistic approach to governance is failing catastrophically. We are attempting to manage a quantum, entangled society using a Newtonian administrative framework.

In reality, public policy issues do not respect bureaucratic boundaries. A crisis in public health (like a pandemic) instantly becomes an economic crisis, an educational crisis, and a national security crisis. A policy designed to stimulate industrial growth in one sector may inadvertently collapse the ecological stability of another. Quantum governance requires a paradigm shift from siloed, linear administration to holistic, systems-level thinking. It demands that policymakers recognize the deep entanglement of social variables, understanding that a legislative action is akin to a wave function that, upon collapsing into law, instantly alters the probability space of the entire society.

Quantum Encryption and Democratic Integrity

At a purely technological level, the quantum revolution will force a total restructuring of government infrastructure. The bedrock of modern digital governance—secure communications, financial transactions, classified intelligence, and citizen data protection—relies on classical encryption algorithms (like RSA). When large-scale quantum computers come online, they will possess the ability to shatter these encryption methods in seconds, an event often referred to as "Q-Day." To prevent the catastrophic exposure of all state and citizen data, governments must urgently transition to post-quantum cryptography.

Conversely, quantum technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to strengthen democratic institutions. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) can create communication networks that are mathematically impossible to wiretap without detection. This could lead to the development of ultra-secure, tamper-proof digital voting systems. In an era plagued by misinformation, electoral interference, and a profound crisis of institutional trust, quantum-secured civic infrastructure could restore faith in the democratic process. By ensuring that every vote is perfectly secure and verifiable, governments can build a new foundation of trust in an increasingly skeptical world.

Policy-Making in a Relational Universe

If we apply the philosophical implications of entanglement to statecraft, we must rethink the nature of the social contract. In an atomized view of society, the individual is a completely independent actor, and the goal of government is merely to referee disputes and protect negative liberties. In an entangled view, the individual is deeply relational; our identities, opportunities, and well-being are inextricably linked to the health of the community. Poverty, crime, and lack of education are not merely individual failures; they are systemic properties that degrade the entire social fabric.

Therefore, policy-making must shift from reactive punishment to proactive, systemic nourishment. For example, investing in early childhood education or universal healthcare is not just a moral charity; it is a structural necessity for maintaining the coherence and resilience of the entangled social whole. When a government drafts a budget, it is not merely allocating funds; it is actively shaping the relational architecture of its citizens. A quantum-informed policy approach evaluates success not just by aggregate GDP, but by the strength, equity, and health of the connections between its people.

The End of Zero-Sum Geopolitics

The Westphalian system of international relations, established in 1648, is based on the concept of absolute, independent nation-state sovereignty. It assumes that nations are separate billiard balls colliding on the global stage, competing in a zero-sum game for finite resources and power. The reality of global entanglement renders this model obsolete. Today, the most pressing existential threats—climate change, pandemics, artificial intelligence alignment, and nuclear proliferation—cannot be solved by any single nation acting alone, no matter how powerful.

The illusion of independent sovereignty is actively dangerous when facing entangled global crises. If one nation aggressively pursues carbon-heavy industrialization to gain a temporary economic advantage, the resulting climate devastation will eventually destroy its own coastal cities and agricultural base. Geopolitics must evolve from a competitive arena into a collaborative planetary management system. We must develop transnational institutions capable of governing the spaces between nations, managing the global commons, and enforcing relational accountability.

Toward a Quantum State (LoveShift in Administration)

Applying LoveShift to government means redefining the very purpose of the state. The state must transition from being an enforcer of boundaries and a manager of isolated parts to becoming a facilitator of connections and a steward of the whole. This involves decentralizing power where appropriate—allowing local, highly connected communities to manage their own specific needs—while simultaneously strengthening global cooperation for planetary-scale issues. It requires an administrative agility that can adapt to rapid, non-linear changes, much like a quantum system adapting to observation.

Ultimately, a quantum government recognizes that the well-being of the state is entirely dependent on the well-being of the most vulnerable nodes in its network. It operates on the principle of radical interdependence, replacing the politics of division and zero-sum competition with a politics of integration, empathy, and shared destiny. By aligning our systems of governance with the fundamental, entangled nature of reality, we can build societies that are not only more resilient and secure, but fundamentally more humane.

6. Applied Perspective: Implications for Life on Earth and LoveShift

The practical significance of interconnection becomes especially clear when applied to contemporary global crises. Ecological degradation, armed conflict, economic inequality, social fragmentation, and technological risk are intensified by models of thought that treat people, nations, and ecosystems as fundamentally separate and competing units.

LoveShift, as used in this article, refers to a transition from an identity structured primarily around isolated self-interest toward one grounded in relationship, stewardship, and shared consequence. The term is ethical rather than sentimental. It suggests that care, responsibility, and mutual regard are not optional ideals but conditions for long-term civilizational viability.

If reality is understood in relational terms, then environmental harm is not externalized damage inflicted on a distant world. It is harm within a system of which humanity is an inseparable part. Likewise, social injustice cannot be treated as morally peripheral simply because it occurs elsewhere. Interdependence changes the frame: consequences ripple through the whole.

This shift has implications across multiple domains:

1. Economics and institutions: systems should reward long-term value creation, transparency, and resilience rather than short-term extraction.

2. Ecology and sustainability: policy and daily practice must reflect dependence on living systems, biodiversity, clean air, stable climate, and regenerative resource use.

3. Social architecture: education, media, and governance should cultivate empathy, discernment, cooperation, and the capacity to navigate difference without dehumanization.

LoveShift is therefore best understood as a disciplined cultural reorientation. It asks whether human beings can align behavior with the reality of deep interdependence before cumulative crises make that alignment unavoidable through collapse.

7. Questions & Answers

Q. Does quantum entanglement allow for faster-than-light communication?
A. No. Entangled particles exhibit correlations that appear instantaneously across distance, but those correlations cannot be used to send controlled, usable information faster than light. This is consistent with the no-communication theorem and preserves the central constraints of relativity.

Q. How exactly does human consciousness collapse the quantum wave function?
A. Sorry, I don't know. This remains part of the broader measurement problem in quantum mechanics, and there is no scientific consensus that human consciousness is the mechanism responsible for wave-function collapse.

Q. Can macroscopic objects, such as humans, become quantum entangled?
A. In principle, larger systems can exhibit quantum behavior, but maintaining entanglement at macroscopic scales is extremely difficult because of decoherence. Interactions with the environment rapidly disrupt clean quantum correlations. While increasingly large systems have been entangled experimentally, this is very different from saying that everyday human-scale objects display stable, measurable entanglement in ordinary conditions.

Q. What is the practical application of LoveShift?
A. Its practical application is ethical and institutional. It encourages individuals, organizations, and governments to make decisions through the lens of interdependence: reducing harm, increasing accountability, designing for long-term resilience, and recognizing that social and ecological systems cannot be treated as external to human well-being.

Q. Is the "Big C" a religious concept?
A. Not necessarily. It can be framed religiously, spiritually, philosophically, or metaphysically depending on context. In this article, it is presented as a concept situated at the intersection of consciousness studies, philosophy of mind, and interpretations of reality influenced by quantum thought.

8. Conclusion

The path from quantum entanglement to questions of consciousness, mysticism, and global ethics reveals a shared theme: reality may be more deeply relational than everyday perception suggests. Physics does not resolve every philosophical question, and caution is necessary when moving from experiment to metaphysics. Even so, entanglement has permanently altered how the structure of the world can be imagined.

Whether interpreted scientifically, philosophically, or spiritually, the larger lesson is that separation may be a limited view rather than the final one. In an age defined by planetary-scale consequences, that insight has urgent force. If interdependence is fundamental, then responsibility is not an abstract moral preference. It is essential.

9. References & Further Reading

1. Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982). Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers. Physical Review Letters.
2. Bell, J. S. (1964). On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics Physique Fizika.
3. Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge.
4. Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
5. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review.
6. Huxley, A. (1945). The Perennial Philosophy. Harper & Brothers.
7. Radin, D. (2006). Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality. Paraview Pocket Books.
8. Zeilinger, A. (2010). Dance of the Photons: From Einstein to Quantum Teleportation. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

One Earth One Chance 

 www.oneearthonechance.com